Showing posts with label bonds. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bonds. Show all posts

Thursday, 17 December 2015

Bonds send ominous signs no matter where in the world



Ask any bond trader in Tokyo, London or New York what their view on the global economy is, and you’re likely to get a similar, decidedly downbeat answer.

That’s not just because fixed-income types are a dour bunch at the best of times. A quick scan across government debt markets suggests that investors are pricing in the likelihood that growth and inflation around the world will remain tepid for years to come.

In Europe, bonds yielding less than zero have ballooned to $1.9 trillion, with the average yield on an index of euro-area sovereign notes due within five years turning negative for the first time. Worldwide, the bond market’s outlook for inflation is now close to levels last seen during the global recession. And even in the U.S., the bright spot in the global economy, 10- year Treasury yields are pinned near 2 percent-- well below what most on Wall Street expected by now.

Where are the animal spirits to turn us around?” said Charles Diebel, the London-based head of rates at Aviva Investors, which oversees about $377 billion. What you see in the bond market is “a lack of confidence in the future.”

Diebel says his firm favors sovereign bonds issued by countries that are loosening monetary policy and betting against debt from nations that produce commodities.

Deflation Risk

With the risk of deflation lingering in Europe, China slashing interest rates to combat flagging growth and a raft of indicators fueling concern the U.S. economy is losing steam, it’s not hard to understand why many investors are pessimistic. And the persistent demand for the safety of government bonds also raises thorny questions about whether the Federal Reserve should be raising interest rates when central banks in Europe, Asia and many emerging markets are struggling to revive their own economies.

Appetite for safe assets is so strong in Europe that about 30 percent of the $6.3 trillion of sovereign bonds in the euro area have negative yields, index data compiled by Bloomberg show. That means buyers who hold to maturity are willing to accept small losses in return for the promise that most of their money will be returned.

In the past week alone, yields on about $500 billion of the bonds fell below zero, pushing the average yield for the region’s bonds due within five years to minus 0.025 percent, the lowest on record, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

More QE?

A big part of the push has to do with stubbornly persistent concerns over the state of affairs in Europe. For the 19 nations that share the euro, consumer prices were flat in October after falling 0.1 percent in September. In Germany, the region’s biggest economy, exports in August tumbled by the most since the 2009 recession, while factory orders and industrial production unexpectedly declined.

Among bond investors, that’s bolstered the view the European Central Bank will need to step up its quantitative easing to stimulate demand.

“Even after successive rounds of QE there is no sign of inflation anywhere out there,” said David Tan, the London-based global head of rates at JPMorgan Asset Management, which oversees more than $1.7 trillion. “We still face massive growth headwinds” and that will support demand for even low-yielding bonds.

Worries that lackluster growth will linger aren’t limited to Europe. Bond traders have pushed down 10-year yields in China to 3 percent for the first time since 2009 as the central bank cut rates six times in less than a year to spur what’s poised to be the weakest growth in a quarter century.

New Normal

In the U.S., yields on benchmark Treasuries were 2.13 percent in Asian trading on Monday, less than where they were at the start of the year and well below the 3 percent threshold that forecasters in a Bloomberg survey in January called for by year-end.

Bond investors have snapped up U.S. government debt as reports from new home sales to consumer prices have disappointed. Americans themselves have also pared pared back inflation expectations over the next 5 to 10 years to an all- time low, according to a University of Michigan survey released last week.

The economy is “looking relatively subpar,” said Thomas Tucci, the head of Treasury trading at CIBC World Markets Corp. in New York. “Japan, China, Europe are not growing at the levels they used to. You have to ask, where is the engine?”

Last month, the International Monetary Fund cut its global growth forecasts for 2015 and 2016 as weak commodity prices drive a slowdown in emerging markets. The IMF now forecasts growth of 3.1 percent this year. In the half decade before the financial crisis, annual growth was at least 4 percent a year.

The world’s richest nations also remain threatened by deflationary pressures, according to the Washington-based organization.

Japanese Lessons

Bond traders agree. In the developed world, they see inflation averaging 1.01 percent in future years, based on index data compiled by Bank of America Corp. Rarely has that measure fallen lower since the last recession ended.

Against that backdrop, a growing chorus of voices say the Fed may be moving too soon, especially after policy makers signaled they would consider tightening at their next meeting in December. Based on futures trading, the likelihood of the Fed raising rates by year-end is 50 percent. The central bank has held borrowing costs near zero since 2008.

Among those advising patience are Mizuho Asset Management’s Yusuke Ito, who says the Fed risks repeating the Bank of Japan’s mistakes by trying to head off inflation when it doesn’t exist. Policy makers there, who have struggled with deflationary pressures for two decades, raised interest rates in 2006 and 2007, only to reverse course in 2008.

“Growth is not strong enough to generate inflation,” said Ito, a Tokyo-based senior money manager at Mizuho, which oversees $41 billion. If the Fed lifts rates, “it’s going to stall growth.”

-- Bloomberg

Thursday, 13 August 2015

High-frequency trading in bonds gets risky



High-frequency trading in the US government bond market carries risks that threaten the ability of the market to function as well as the ability of investors to fairly value assets, two government officials said on Monday. The impact of high frequency trading has come under increased scrutiny since the “flash crash” last October, in which US Treasuries registered wild price swings in just a 12-minute period.

Critics of high-frequency trading, a computerized strategy that can move billions of dollars in fractions of a second, blame it for causing excessive price swings in the bond market, which is already facing a decline in liquidity.

Federal Reserve Governor Jerome Powell acknowledged the innovation that high frequency trading has brought to the bond market, but he questioned how investors could value the long-term value of a bond or any asset.

If trading is at nanoseconds, there won’t be a lot of ‘fundamental’ news to trade on or much time to formulate views about the long-run value of an asset; instead, trading at these speeds can become a game played against order books and the market rules,” Powell said, speaking on a panel at a conference on US bond market structure sponsored by the Brookings Institute.

PRESSURE
Antonio Weiss, counselor to the US Treasury secretary, was blunter.

The constant pursuit to save one more millisecond not only consumes resources potentially better invested elsewhere, but increases the pressure on the plumbing of the system to handle ever-increasing speeds and messaging traffic,” he said in a speech prepared for delivery to the panel.

The impact of high frequency trading on the $12.5 trillion Treasuries market was profound last Oct. 15, with many questions still unanswered.

On that day, the trading volume of US Treasuries exploded in a matter of 12 minutes. Benchmark 10-year Treasuries yields swung in a 37-basis-point range during that period, only to end 6 basis points lower on the day, according to a report released in July by the Treasury, the Federal Reserve, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission

The report said companies that engage in algorithmic trading, or Principal Trading Firms, accounted for 70 to 75% of total trading in both the cash and futures markets, up from about 50% on “normal” days.

Weiss said high frequency trading “is, quite simply, a disruptive technological innovation, which has reshaped an entire industry structure.

Weiss and Powell said the changing bond market structure stemming from the growing role of high frequency trading warrants more examination.

Is the race for speed helping or hurting market function?” Weiss said.

-- Reuters

Thursday, 6 March 2008

Forming your portfolio

Your portfolio is considered Good as long as it is Well structured, Diversified and it's risk does not exceed your risk-tolerance level.
Now, what do i mean by well structured? You see, investing is not walking in the park, it's full of dangers and it's always ready to take all your money and run! (Of course walking in park in the middle of the night is not too pleasant either, but at least a mugger can only take the money you have with yourself at that moment.) Now, don't cry, if you follow my advice, you won't need to worry about losing all your money. There are quite a few portfolio risk management tools that you must use.

First of all, it is structuring your portfolio. A well structured portfolio can save you a lot of trouble by itself. Structuring means, assigning a particular percentage of your money to one or another investment instrument. That would be stocks, bonds, real estate, precious metals, artwork, cash etc. The simplest way to structure your portfolio is buying only stocks and bonds. And usually that is more than enough. We'll talk about alternative investment methods later on. Now, bonds have much lower risk (almost risk-free) than stocks, also because the rate of return is fixed, you know precisely what your return will be, that's why bonds should make up a large portion of your portfolio. And then depending on your risk-tolerance, you can decide, how much stocks do you want. Even though stocks are sometimes volatile over the short term, they have proven to be the best investment for long-term growth. In fact, no other investment instrument has provided a higher return over the long term than stocks! That's why stocks should be combined with bonds. Bonds help to stabilise the volatility of stocks, cover short term stock losses and gives a tasty little profit when the times are good.

The second tool, and also one of the most essential is stock Diversification. Diversification is spreading stock investments into different stocks. You would not want to spend all your money on some company's stocks only to see it go bankrupt and lose everything you had. That's why diversifying your stocks is of key importance. Let's say you decide that 30 % of your portfolio would be bonds and 70% would be stocks. Now, you should diversify that 70% of your stocks. IT should consist of at least 5 different stocks in 5 different industry branches and possibly countries. Also it would be wise to choose investment with varying risk levels, as this would ensure that losses are covered by other areas of your diversified portfolio. Diversifying reduces the risk dramatically, which is exactly what we want.

Wednesday, 5 March 2008

Protect your money!

Calculating your net worth helps you see the realistic image on where your finances stand, however, in order for the image not to become worse, you must Protect your money!
Now, what do i mean by that? If you thought that you should grab your cash, stick in a sock and keep it all nice, warm and safe, resting in your armpit, while you drink juice, then there is nothing left to do but for you to slap yourself and order yourself to WAKE UP! Honestly. Do not, and i stresst that DO NOT keep your money at home! Avoid keeping large sums of money in your house at all costs! Now you may wonder: "Why all this fuzz, why keeping money in my house is bad? Should i put my money in bank? I live in a 21st century, of course i keep money in a bank, that's so obvious!" But, i would have to dissapoint you again.. Yes, keeping your money in a bank is a better idea, but it's not the Best idea! You see, while keeping your money in a bank, you gain interest, that's fine, but that is not enough. On the most cases, the interest rate that bank offers is not high enough to cover the worst nightmare for money -> INFLATION !
Yes, inflation majority of time is bigger than interest rates and this leads to your money losing it's worth. For those of you that don't know what inflation means:
"Inflation is a rise in the general level of prices of goods and services in a given economy over a period of time. It may also refer to the rise in the prices of some more specific set of goods or services. In either case, it is measured as the percentage rate."
Now, the bigger the inflation, the faster your money lose their value. Let's take an example, you have $10.000 and inflation rate is 10%, then in 5 years your $10.000 will only be worth 50% of it's value Today. Yes, banks help to reduce this creeping death, but it's still not enough.
The next logical question you should ask: "So what do i do now? Will i lose all my money? There should be a way!". And yes, there is a way. It is called - INVESTING !
Investing in BONDS is probably the safest and easiest way to protect your money from inflation! Bonds are absolutely great! Depending on your risk tolerance, bonds should make a large portion of your portfolio as they are one of the most important investing instrument there is.